CTA literature and source roles
Open the filterable report. The review covers all 96 proteins: 41 previously unmatched and 55 previously found only in a broad screening table.
76 have linked primary or related papers; 65 have an exact-human study credited under the declared coverage rule. Evidence types are shown separately: a DNA association is not a protein experiment.
The harmonized collection has 83 core papers and 67 supplementary sources. Its mapped coverage reaches 569 of the 602 released CTA records. 33 remain without qualifying paper coverage. The expression and reference datasets remain the basis of selection.
The 1.31.0 classifications here are frozen. Current reference selection and coding reviews apply the GDPD4, SLCO1B3–SLCO1B7 and FRG2/FRG2B holds; use that report for current classifications and sequence coordinates.
- Individual reviews
- Core and supplementary sources, roles and overlap
- Paper coverage for all 602 CTAs
- All 33 paper gaps: biology, measurements and assessment
- All 29 normal-expression and identity concerns
- Localization of all 602 CTAs, with evidence and mapping scope
- External domain sizes and sequence attribution for 37 membrane candidates
- Membrane candidate cancer RNA counts, with TCGA/validation separate
- Separate scored-patient cancer staining counts
- Complete registry, including source-row occurrences
- Search queries and retrieval receipts
- Figure: review outcomes
- Reproduction manifest
Rebuild offline with .venv/bin/python scripts/build_cta_literature_review.py. Refresh indexed searches with scripts/review_unlisted_cta_literature.py and cited records with scripts/fetch_cta_individual_review.py; neither script automatically accepts a finding. The pinned workbook importer is scripts/import_cta_program_tables.py.